The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
by that metric our the zone two i'm talking about is lower zone three so if you're coming at this and you're a cyclist and you're saying what's this zone two that peter's talking about plug yourself into the bottom of your zone three and that's about where you'll be
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my zone 2 is actually at about 78 to 81% of my maximum heart rate
today i spend three or four hours a week in this zone but i still believe this is incredibly important
heart rate today right now about 137 it's been as high as 142 as low as 1 34 meaning throughout the past couple of weeks
today I'm averaging 225 Watts over the past 2 weeks it's been as high as 230 as low as 218
I never paid attention to whether I dipped in and out of it.
I never paid attention to whether I dipped in and out of it. I talk a lot to professional cyclists and it's the same.