The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so my maone formula would have my heart rate be uh 129 okay well I can tell you9 is never in zone two for me except on the worst day you know maybe once every two months I might have a zone two based on lactate where my actual heart rate ends up being 129 it's almost always going to be in the high 130s and sometimes in the low 140s
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so this morning I got up my HRV was I don't even remember 78 milliseconds slept 7 hours 15 minutes good quality sleep not sore felt good so I actually had a pretty high Target today my Target today was 141 was the heart rate on a day that's about as high as it will predict me to be on a on a day when everything sucks it might tell me as low as 129 usually it's about 136 137 138 is where it's predicting and that's generally aligning with where my lactate is where what that'll generally put me at a lactate about 1.9