The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the origins of kind of the 8 or2 are interesting and it was basically just looking at the training logs of a lead athletes and seeing what they do when you broke it down basically by intensity 80% of their sessions tended to be in this lower Zone 2ish intensity and then 20% of the sessions appear to be in the higher intensity training
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Structuring structuring the amount of let's say low to moderate intensity or Zone 2 I know we're not measuring lactate directly but let's call it that versus your high-intensity interval training a lot of people out there you'll you'll see on a lot of platforms people say 8020 right 80% of your exercise workout should be like low to moderate 20% should be high intensity Dr gabala talked a little bit about this the distribution the weekly training volume you know how how how someone who is not like yourself you know endurance athlete do they need to follow this 8020 rule or how
it's not necessarily based on time but rather sessions per week so say you're doing five Training sessions per week one of those if you're falling to 820 one of those would be high intensity four of those would be moderate intensity