The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if zone two on a rower is three watts per kilo good look i think 3 watts per kilo of zone 2 is very good regardless of what avenue you get it on so meaning if you can do 45 minutes at 3 watts per kilo of body weight you're only one watt per kilo below what a professional cyclist is doing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they stay relatively flat until they hit about 300 watts is when they finally cross over that threshold
we think that three watts per kilogram would be kind of the elite level that we would want to see people