The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I actually did an hour of that zone two you know kind of two millimole stuff and then did four minute awful repeats where it was like much much higher power for four minutes and then I rested for four minutes and then went again for four minutes and then rested for four minutes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for example on Sunday that was my workout it was I actually did an hour of that zone two you know kind of two millimole stuff and then did four minute awful repeats where it was like much much higher power for four minutes and then I rested for four minutes and then went again for four minutes and then rested for four minutes and at the end of those four minute blocks you know my lactate will be 15 or 16.
on Sunday that was my workout was I actually did an hour of that zone two you know kind of two mill stuff and then did 4 minute awful repeats where it was like much much higher power for four minutes and then I rested for four minutes and then went again for 4 minutes and then rested for 4 minutes