We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so i explained this to patients when they say um i went out and did a two-hour ride today and it showed me that i spent 45 of those minutes 45 of those 120 minutes were in zone 2. so i did 45 minutes of zone 2 and i said no you didn't really do it because you were going up and down and up and down and up and down and so that's not the same as spending 45 minutes in the dedicated uh energy system you're right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you cannot look zone two and say this is your zone two because you did two 10 10 minutes test on this power yeah because it's too much up down yeah and uh if you're doing 5 hour ride your zone two after 5 hours maybe be not be your Zone 2 anymore so you need to also you always need to know at what time this zone two will not be your zone two anymore