David Sinclair· PhD
New paper suggests its effects may not be by controlling sugar but by raising NAD!
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
New paper suggests its effects may not be by controlling sugar but by raising NAD!
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
caloric restriction is good for you a carbos is sort of like caloric restriction and it doesn't block glucose absorption but it does block the digestion of starches to sugars and so glucose wouldn't go up so much that would be good for you just like caloric restriction in their view and that was their rationale
now in mice it turns out it doesn't go down we've done this twice now so it's probably not an overall change in the amount of glucose that gets in but a change in the kinetics