The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Like you can't say that, right? But like we can tell people to travel and like expose themselves to those sorts of risks. We just don't that culturally we don't talk about these risks or understand them. And it's clear when you get on a on a plane and everybody's drinking alcohol and there's bright lights everywhere and screens and nobody's sleeping like we just don't respect the damage that travel can do in our culture and we need to.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.