The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And that process of going from ethanol to acetaldehyde to acetate does involve the production of a toxic molecule, right? Again, acetaldehyde is really toxic. And NAD, and if we want to get technical, it's the NAD-to-NADH ratio, and that chemical step is the rate-limiting step to ethanol's metabolism.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
ethanol or alcohol that starts to get processed so how do we how how does a normal liver cell process this alcohol dehydrogenase you're going from alcohol to um acetal dhide acetal dhide is then metabolized further and it eventually becomes you know carbon dioxide water ordinary you know uh type of moities right