We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Problem is non-drinkers include people who are like in alcoholic synonymous. That's why they don't drink. They had a, you know, a wretched experience with alcohol. And so, um, you know, they had they've had different kinds of damage to their bodies. Maybe their health is isn't as good. They're not going to live as long, but it's not that they would be better off if they went back to drinking.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the J curve is a misnomer