The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if somebody came into your office um and they're having six drinks a day and they acknowledge you know go through the steps to acknowledge hey this is problematic and they agree to want to stop you wouldn't be able to just say hey leave your office uh don't drink and I'll see you in four weeks there's a very good chance they would be dead due to the cardiovascular side effects
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.