The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it's definitely it's now known that pregnant has a problem nesic effect uh there are several rodent trials around studies with like the Alzheimer version in rodents right um it worked very well um now let's see if there's now actually a clinical trial for Alzheimer's with the pregnant alone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are several rodent trials around the studies with like the Alzheimer's version in rodents right um it worked very well um now let's see if there's now actually a clinical trial for Alzheimer's pregnant alone so let's let's see if it works