The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
researchers in the 1800s around the turn of the century well up into the 1960s were hyperfocused on the role of metabolism in severe mental illness schizophrenia bipolar disorder they were actually measuring levels of lactate and glucose and um and other kind of metabol biomarkers in people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder documenting differences really kind of H honi in on the these metabolic disruptions is potentially the cause of mental illness
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.