The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the hypothesis um i believe the gentleman's name is rubenstein i believe he was at stanford but he's dead now but he was very interested in the hypothesis that these non-protein amino acids predominantly from plant foods predominantly from seeds and beans could accumulate in the human body and cause misfolding of proteins
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.