The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean, one of the things that I'm interested in is in individuals who have diseases, which will affect pre-Botzinger complex. And there's data in Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy, which is another form of neurodegeneration where there's loss of neurons in pre-Botzinger.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And we think that what could be happening is that the proximate cause of death is not heart failure, is that they become apneic. They stop breathing and don't resuscitate. And that resuscitation may or may not be due to an explicit suppression of sighs, but to an overall suppression of the whole apparatus of the pre-Botzinger complex.