The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's one idea that it has to do with the fact that women have a redundant set of genes on their ex their second x chromosome right so if they have a defective gene or genes on one of the x chromosomes the other one can compensate for it to a certain extent
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if that's true i don't know if we have enough men with klein felters out there but we that would be an interesting comparative analysis right just for folks listening men with klinefelters instead of having xy have xxy so they would also have that same redundancy of genes right