The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In aged mice and in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease, these engram neurons showed classic hallmarks of aging and disease: gene expression patterns were altered, epigenetic marks were disrupted, and neurons were hyperexcitable in ways typical of Alzheimer’s pathology
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.