The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so there are times when we can track hippocampal volume over the course of progression of alzheimer's and the shrinking sort of correlates with the amount of cognitive impairment but sometimes not you know sometimes we have people who are very impaired and their brain doesn't really look that bad and sometimes we have people who look like they shouldn't be able
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
would tracking that over time for changes reductions presumably would that provide any meaningful insight sometimes but not always
there are times when we can track hippocampal volume over the course of progression of alzheimer's and the shrinking sort of correlates with the amount of cognitive impairment
sometimes but not always so other things can affect hippocampal volume for example people who are chronically exposed to elevated levels of cortisol or stress hormone you know who people have post traumatic stress disorder we know they have smaller hippocampi than people who don't have that and so it there are times when we can track hippocampal volume over the course of progression of alzheimer's and the shrinking sort of correlates with the amount of cognitive impairment but sometimes not