The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so unlike cancer where the diagnosis is made typically off imaging and then ultimately through a tissue sample right the gold standard is a histological diagnosis that's not the case in alzheimer's disease we don't do biopsies of the brain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so unlike cancer where the diagnosis is made typically off imaging and then ultimately through a tissue sample right the gold standard is a histological diagnosis that's not the case in alzheimer's disease we don't do biopsies of the brain