Peter Attia· MD
between the other markers such as you know mri imaging and pet fdg pet which measures how well the brain is using glucose as its fuel and has different patterns supporting one diagnosis over another
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
between the other markers such as you know mri imaging and pet fdg pet which measures how well the brain is using glucose as its fuel and has different patterns supporting one diagnosis over another
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as far as csf goes you know there's a good correlation between the pet and csf findings because i am a geriatric psychiatrist and not a neurologist i'm not typically doing lumbar punctures as part of my practice um generally speaking between the other markers such as you know mri imaging and pet fdg pet which measures how well the brain is using glucose as its fuel and has different patterns supporting one diagnosis over another and that is usually covered by some insurance