The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the diagnosis is it requires the clinical story with or without amyloid and so when you look at the venn diagram of people with amyloid and people with clinical symptoms suggestive of dementia and you line them up there's an overlap but it's not a perfect union and what that tells us is that amyloid is neither necessary nor sufficient for alzheimer's disease correct
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.