The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as I understand Alzheimer's is a a nerd gener disorder — impacts the hippocampus among other structures... if you look at us slice of human brain from an alz a patient that died with Alzheimer's maybe even from Alzheimer that you see plaques and Tangles you see these — subcellar structures and buildup and that our basic understanding of Alzheimer's that's in the textbook and that most people have heard of — is still correct
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.