Andrew Huberman· PhD
very important Point here is that the e E4 genes are not deterministic so they're highly associated with the risk but they're not deterministic
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
very important Point here is that the e E4 genes are not deterministic so they're highly associated with the risk but they're not deterministic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's no question it's high risk but it's important to note it's not deterministic no it's not determination and in fact it's far less penetrant than FH is yes it is