The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's um some uh interesting and increasing evidence that looking at the neural retina which one can do with these new technologies um can provide a window into um whether or not there are forms of degeneration just such as Alzheimer's and other forms of neurod degeneration deeper within the brain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in other words Imaging the eye in order to determine if someone is developing V in Alzheimer's because you have a direct view into a little piece of the brain it's a it's a good signal it can help you figure stuff out about what's going on in your brain even beyond the sunken eyes