Peter Attia· MD
and proportionally it's more successful probably than anabolic steroids but the ceiling of anabolic activity seems to be lower.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and proportionally it's more successful probably than anabolic steroids but the ceiling of anabolic activity seems to be lower.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and proportionally it's more successful probably than anabolic steroids but the sealing of anabolic activity seems to be lower so when people use sarms they do not gain as much muscle as when they use anabolic steroids
and proportionally it's more successful probably than anabolic steroids but the sealing of anabolic activity seems to be lower