The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we have plenty of empirical evidence to show that young people I'm going to focus on young people because you know when when you think about a policy intervention I really think we're thinking about how to direct that to young people um that young people endorse that they feel addicted to social media not not all but many and that they use it more than they would like and that it's adversely affecting their mental health that is a powerful piece of evidence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.