The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I had a coronary artery calcium score uh in 2020 and it was Zero at that point I was 42 or 43 I believe and um interestingly you know my father had an angioplasty when he was about that age so I certainly have a family history of accelerated coronary artery disease at that point in my life my LDL was 500 um but my CAC was Zero
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.