Andrew Huberman· PhD
So carbon dioxide's heavier than air. So we can measure we could measure carbon dioxide from s, you know, just tubes on the ground and you could get the real-time differential of CO2 in there.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So carbon dioxide's heavier than air. So we can measure we could measure carbon dioxide from s, you know, just tubes on the ground and you could get the real-time differential of CO2 in there.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.