The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so Genova makes a test called a nutri eval which i think is valuable GI map from diagnostic solutions is a gut test and then some sort of comprehensive bloodwork panel with includes lipids through NMR as well as inflammatory markers and a thyroid panel as well as an iron panel and you're also gonna need copper zinc and a bunch of other stuff
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
blood work would be the cdc combination you know hormones thyroid hscrp probably uric acid that's basic blood work i think you'd also want to do something like a gi map for diagnostic solutions is a good place to start it's not a perfect test but it's reasonable um i think uh organic acids is helpful as well to kind of like piece together you're currently looking at everything through a flurry lens into a box and nothing's really clear i think urinary organic gases and urinary microtoxins it's important a lot of you know this microtoxins that's really critical and then um if you really want to ground out i think you have to look at things like heavy metals in some way shape or form i don't even think it has to be provoked i used to think you had to use like dmsa or eta but you just do urinary heavy metals lead cadmium arsenic and mercury would be reasonable in your urine