The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so um if you there's a a beautiful study um among pregnancy planners out of Denmark quite a long time ago um and in that study what they did was take couples that were trying to conceive that had never or not recently I can't remember used oral contraceptives and then they saw what the sperm count was and how long it took them to conceive right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.