Peter Attia· MD
both always at you know prior prior to resection uh or radiation whatever the treatment was and then in subsequent follow-up visits usually you know at the time of their follow-up scans when they're coming back to see us
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
both always at you know prior prior to resection uh or radiation whatever the treatment was and then in subsequent follow-up visits usually you know at the time of their follow-up scans when they're coming back to see us
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.