Peter Attia· MD
If I recall, you wouldn't check a PSA on a man right after doing a rectal exam on him because in theory, that could artificially have raised the PSA, presumably by creating more of an insult and increasing that flow.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If I recall, you wouldn't check a PSA on a man right after doing a rectal exam on him because in theory, that could artificially have raised the PSA, presumably by creating more of an insult and increasing that flow.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.