The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the only studies that I've seen check that is for people with HIV apparently it's a very reliable biomarker of future mortality for people who are HIV positive interesting yeah but I don't know how to order it because if I I went through some of these self-testing Labs where you can order test directly not a single one of them offers it but laptop LabCorp and Quest have it but I think a doctor has sorted like you can probably prescribe it to somebody
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
another biomarker of chronic systemic in the Box exposure interestingly it's a very good predictor of mortality from HIV
another one that you mentioned the last one is soluble City 14 uh another biomarker of chronic systemic endotoxin exposure interestingly it's a very good predictor of mortality from HIV