Paul Saladino· MD
hs-CRP: <.5 mg/L
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
hs-CRP: <.5 mg/L
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
usually when I look at my clients they're less than 0.3 if it's above 1 I definitely raise an eyebrow and I think there's something going on there but a lot of the time once we get stuff figured out it'll go down to 0.3
HS CRP I've talked about that a lot in the past people are probably familiar with that one you want to see that one as low as possible usually when I look at my clients they're less than 0.3 if it's above 1 I definitely raise an eyebrow and I think there's something going on there
in the inflammation spectrum I mentioned mainly the inflammation markers for people to see and those would be high sensitivity c-reactive protein HSC RP in functional medicine we want it under one
here's another hm scrp of 0.58
this is hscrp which is anything less than a three milligrams per deciliter you're going to need to get an hscrp if you just get CRP it starts at three guys if you want to know what your CRP is and it's less than three you have to get hscrp
his highly sensitive c-reactive protein is 1.3 again most people wouldn't think anything of it most people think anything below two is fine we kind of like to see it below one