The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But CRP is, it's actually, hCRP, there's a high sensitive hCRP, your doctor will know. Get one of those readings. 'Cause if you've got normal blood sugar levels, your doctor, or fasting blood sugar levels, your doctor might say you're fine. But a lot of people have normal blood sugar, but have high CRP, which is just as bad for you longterm, and can predict a future heart attack.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But a lot of people have normal blood sugar but have high CRP, which is just as bad for you, long-term, and can predict a future heart attack.