Andrew Huberman· PhD
so a resting fasted lactate should be in a healthy person should be below one like somewhere between 0.3.6 millimole
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so a resting fasted lactate should be in a healthy person should be below one like somewhere between 0.3.6 millimole
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you take lactate levels in people at rest there's a high association between what that tells you about their general health so the less healthy an individual is the higher their lactate level is
a resting fasted lactate should be in a healthy person should be below one like somewhere between 0.3.6 millimole
one of the less common things that we do look at is resting and fasting lactate levels um and obviously lactate performance in response to exercise so that's also kind of a functional test