Peter Attia· MD
if a test has and this is going to be i think amazing for people 50 sensitivity 99.5 specificity if you said that that was your stage one performance in an unbiased sample i think people would be like wow that's pretty good
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if a test has and this is going to be i think amazing for people 50 sensitivity 99.5 specificity if you said that that was your stage one performance in an unbiased sample i think people would be like wow that's pretty good
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.