Bryan Johnson· Author
Blood via plastic lancet: 42 particles, 34 particles <10 um and 8 particles between 10-30 um Blood via metal lancet: 1 particle between 10-30 um
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Blood via plastic lancet: 42 particles, 34 particles <10 um and 8 particles between 10-30 um Blood via metal lancet: 1 particle between 10-30 um
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The plastic uh things are very easy. You just hit the fingertip and then you're done. Uh this you have a metal like it's a metal sword or metal spear. It's hard to stick that in your finger if someone else can do it for you. But just a heads up, we've tested a metal lancet versus a plastic and the plastic lancet uh does cause a lot of to uh plastic exposure in the test. So you get an inaccurate reading. So you need to use the metal lancet in order to get the accurate results.