Paul Saladino· MD
high levels of uric acid are problematic for humans but not labels of uric acid like i have 3.9 4.6 levels of seven six even eight nine ten those levels become problematic at levels that are physiologic
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
high levels of uric acid are problematic for humans but not labels of uric acid like i have 3.9 4.6 levels of seven six even eight nine ten those levels become problematic at levels that are physiologic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my uric acid is 3.9 milligrams per deciliter it's not even physiologic
high levels of uric acid are problematic for humans but not levels of uric acid like I have 3.9 4.6 levels of seven six even 8 nine 10 those levels become problematic
so if a uric acid comes back really high like 9 or 10 i have no doubt that that based on everything i've done i have no doubt that that's not good not only does it increase the risk for gout but it increases the risk of kidney disease and all these things