Peter Attia· MD
So for me, the 4K, which again, you didn't, I mean, you
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So for me, the 4K, which again, you didn't, I mean, you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And the 4K score is great because Andrew Vickers and Hans Lilja developed it with this other great urologist, Peter Scardino, at Memorial. And what they looked at was, well, what's the chance that this person is diagnosed with and has high-grade, aggressive, lethal prostate cancer, and it gives you a percentile chance.
And the reverse is if you're greater than 7.5%, I think it's like 16 or 17% chance in 20 years.