The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
No. Uh, this is cool because you're informing people that there's such a thing as biological age. A person can be 25 and have a heart of a 20-year-old or a 30-year-old. I'm assuming here they're doing some simplified version of heart age, which is fine. Again, it builds intuition, but you really can go very deep in getting the biological age of any organ, including dozens of measurements.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.