Andrew Huberman· PhD
When people use Function, they get their lab tests done, and then we follow them for every six months. And we can see the changes in the biomarkers toward the positive, how many people go from abnormal to normal.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
When people use Function, they get their lab tests done, and then we follow them for every six months. And we can see the changes in the biomarkers toward the positive, how many people go from abnormal to normal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There's tens of thousands of pages of content that have been highly curated and scientifically referenced on what to do if you have this or that normal biomarker.