Peter Attia· MD
A PSA density of more than 0.15, that raises a red flag.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
A PSA density of more than 0.15, that raises a red flag.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you have a PSA density that's below that threshold and you have a high PSA low percent free Etc you need a biopsy in my opinion
a young man let's say under 60 that's a PSA density of more than 0.1 or 0.12 yep
if the PSA density in a young man frankly is more than 0.1 I get a little worried if on an average age person if the PSA density is more than 0.15 I also get I start saying let's do some additional testing
if the PSA density in a young man frankly is more than 0.1 I get a little worried if on an average age person if the PSA density is more than 0.15 I also get I start saying let's do some additional test