The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, I would want one of these devices, >> to not just tell me glucose. Uh, I want it to include heart uh function, which I'm doing as well. >> Uh, but I also would include inflammation. So, there's a molecule called CRP, which I always want to keep low cuz that's a really good predictor of cardiovascular. >> Um, and so we've got glucose, Cact inflammation. So, this would be TNF alpha or IL16. These are also predictive of longevity. Uh, I want cortisol.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.