The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we recently published a paper and a new method a new method that's part of our third generation mutation based method that's about a hundred times more sensitive than our prior methods as well as other you know methods in the field we would that can now get down to uh one part in a million
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what makes the mutation based method so much more sensitive is you know what you're looking for you have the mutation a priori in the in the methylation method you don't
the sensitivity of the methylation-based approaches is significantly inferior to that of the mutation-based approaches
is that the mutation based methods are much more sensitive so we recently published a paper and a new method a new method that's part of our third generation mutation based method that's about a hundred times more sensitive than our prior methods as well as other
the prior mutation based method around .01 percent of one in ten thousand
it's probably closer to one one in a thousand it's a point one percent