The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I should qualify that one-year time frame. If you have some reason to believe that you have a fertility problem, I wouldn't necessarily wait a whole year and then go see a, you know, a provider. If your cycles are irregular, if you think you might have polycystic ovary syndrome or something, then you definitely want to see somebody sooner than a year.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.