The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So metabolomics is just study of metabolites, and metabolites, unlike a lot of these other things, they're a relatively finite number of these things, many of which are known, but some of which are not known. So glucose is a metabolite. Acetyl-CoA is a metabolite. Lactate is a metabolite.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.