The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I say, so hang on, I've got this data. I've got the InsideTracker data. So I pull that up on the screen, and I'm showing him the changes in my cholesterol and my CRP, which is inflammatory marker as you know. And we're going through it, and you can see things change over time, and I've corrected them as they go slightly out of the optimal range for me, which is different than what he would do, of course.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So I say, okay, stop. Let's talk a little bit about. - Let me educate you, that's what David tells his physician. I imagine that the 12-year-old David Sinclair says to a physician, "Listen, let's have a different discussion." Is that how it works? - It is. He finds me pretty annoying as does my dentist. But so I say, so hang on, I've got this data. I've got the InsideTracker data. So I pull that up on the screen, and I'm showing him the changes in my cholesterol and my CRP, which is