Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
i'm like okay we're what about like the neutroval micronutrient assay like i know i know a lot of that's not accurate too as far as okay yeah it's kind of like we talked about earlier like you've got this box of the human organism you're looking through like blurry windows and you're like i can kind of make out something it's okay
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.