The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the highest quality evidence of all is the n of one experiment where you serve as your own control so what you're describing with riola I would frame that as n of one experiment where you have a wash out period and you compare before and after
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
What we do-- The NIH basically is great. They now have said that the n-of-1 research is among the highest-quality research.